- Code on time reviews update#
- Code on time reviews windows 10#
- Code on time reviews trial#
- Code on time reviews windows#
which CodeOnTime new "Theme" is what is all about.
Code on time reviews windows#
I prefer CodeOnTime if I need to do an application that adheres to Universal WIndows Application. I do know that they are working on a new form painter/editor and hopefully will enhance the product.
very different that what is out there but at the end it works. The difference with CodeOnTime is their IDE.
their Charting capabilities are based on Google's you can integrate with 3rd party with no problem (like any. HighCharts, FusionCharts).ĬodeOnTime performance is fine. but there are alternatives that can do the job very well.īTW, CodeOnTIme is incredible but you need to abide by their framework "rules" … the end result are extremely powerful LOB apps.Īre you happy with the performance of your CodeOnTime applications, and can you create custom pages that integrate charting capabilities from 3rd-Party vendors into the client-side using JavaScript/Angular/React (i.e. There is nothing like CodeCharge out there …. If you want to do production work, use 9.8 for now. With 10, in view that you can have multiple target page(s), they crated a form "painter" which is looking good … although still needs some work. You could do that prior to 10 but had to jump over a fence :) different versions of Insert form … or Edit). Version 10 and version 9.8 are the same with 1 difference … the ability to create multiple target page(s) (i.e. Net (and CodeCharge … although no new development since 2015). Reviews are hard to come by, but here are two which are unfortunately too true. Version 10 has the features we are looking for - we will wait till more of the bugs have been addressed. application crashes when defining SQL query without assigning alias name to query expression - i.e.
Still somewhat buggy, but appears to have good potential (i.e. Tried the most recent release today - Version 10. Please provide us some screen-shots of applications you have actually with PHPBuilder (with confidential information blurred/removed of course).Īlso, provide online documentation references where the above points are addressed in. via page template variables) prior to page loading. Modifying client-side page template (i.e. build customer input form only, not entire application when an application build request is performed)Ĥ. Parameter passing via GET/POST between data forms.ģ. Pre-built server-side/client-side event handling action methods.Ģ. The following areas seem to be limited, but we're hoping you can clarify each:ġ. We're hoping your responses and examples of actual product usage can help alleviate our
Code on time reviews trial#
Try a trial of version 9.8 to get a better feel for the product.
Code on time reviews update#
Ver 10 is a very ambitious update and was only recently released to production. It's an excellent alternative and support is phenomenal. I've been using for years now after codecharge development stopped. We will wait until a final release comes out before attempting again.
Code on time reviews windows 10#
Tried the beta 10 release of PHPRunner, it did nothing but hang up during execution on our Windows 10 machine. PHPRunner/ASPRunner.Net are great and easy to work and the new version 10 (beta) will basically give you everything that CodeCharge has/had. Net are great and easy to work and the new version 10 (beta) will basically give you everything that CodeCharge has/had. although I like CodeCharge UI/IDE much better. The 2 products that I'm using and work well areĬodeOnTime can build Enterprise level applications and far surpasses CodeCharge. (Proprietary/Oracle, MySQL,PostgreSQL,SQLServer.) (Proprietary Cloud/On-premise - MySQL,SQLServer,ORACLE.) (ORACLE JAVA Cloud/On-premise ORACLE - PL/SQL) Here are seven others, which use a different technology stack, but provide the functionality expected for a serious low-code RAD development environment. They have a long way to go still, more robust client/server event handling, parameter passing between forms, and a host of other things that CCS offers right out of the box, are not yet present - but they are on the right track. But it does have a lot of features and still looks promising. I am actively (frantically) looking for alternatives.įrom what I can tell from the trial, it is very young and has a few bugs.
0 kommentar(er)
